Sunday, June 17, 2007

The Benefits and Costs of Economy and Economic Growth

ANTO COMETA

The Philippines’ economy over the last 10 years could be referred to as a cyclical unsustainable nation. To be more precise, the economic crises that the country has experienced have ranged for more than a decade, but the last 10 years could be considered as a milestone in the country’s devastating condition.

What are the goods and bads of an economy? In Bertell Ollman’s article - Market Economy: Advantages and Disadvantages[1] he discussed the seven main characteristics of a market economy in which both benefits and costs go together. The first characteristic is that people could buy the goods and services they want (or need) only if they have the money to buy for such. Second, Money is a necessity of life – actually this is a fact that no one could contest. Third, In order to acquire money (to suffice the first characteristic) people are forced to do and sell anything. Fourth, the objective of production and investment is to maximize its profit and not to satisfy the social needs. Fifth, the control over those who produce the wealth of the society is no longer carried out but through money and the conditions of a certain task that an individual accepts in order to earn. Sixth, allocation of limited goods is based on money and not through coupons or the basis of who worked harder and longer as well as who needs more than the other. Lastly, In view of the fact that no individual is held back in doing or trying to become wealthy, people gets the notion that each individual gets what they economically deserve.

Economy or the growth in the economy should lead its people to an elevated or at the least a decent living. Growth is already positive in theory or by definition and ideally it should be, but there are several implications when growth is combined with something that concerns the welfare of people and various institutions, such as a country’s economy.

When we say there’s growth in the economy what are the benefits that the people or the country gets? The primary advantage of the growth in economy in terms of the real GDP Per Capita is that the living standards of people improve. In the aspect of labor and employment, this only means that there’s an increase in the employment or reduction in unemployment. In an ideal economy, labor should be at full employment. According to Milton Friedman,[2] full employment means the lowest level of unemployment that can be sustained given the structure of the economy.

On the business side, it provides a higher business confidence which gives a positive effect on both local and global stock markets as well as to small and medium enterprises. And as for the government, this only means one thing (or maybe the other which is quite rampant in the country) – greater fiscal dividend. Since economic growth boosts revenue coming from taxes, the government could spend more money to finance (more) projects.

Growth in the economy however, does have several negative impacts or inevitable consequences particularly for third world countries having a market economy such as ours. One of the disadvantages as an economy grows is the risk of inflation. If the demand for the goods and services increase rapidly (thus affecting the cost to go down rapidly as well) in contrast to the long run productive potential, this could put pressure on the interest rates to rise which results to the loss in the competitiveness of domestic businesses in international markets.

Another, which is directly related and is much applicable in the country’s condition, is that as the economy grows, growth in social-economic inequalities also increases. Unequal distribution of the benefits from the economic growth in terms of profit allocation widens the gap between the people who has the more purchasing power to acquire goods and services as compared to those who have less. The tendency of rich people to become wealthier and the poor increasingly befalls to intolerable poverty. This could also mean increase in gaps between regions in the country which are unreached (or left) by economic reforms and projects as compared to those that are.

At the labor sector end – the risk or increase in workers exploitation. The most feasible movement of businesses to increase its profit is to increase its production and decrease its work force. This could be done either by labor downscale or cut back in employee benefits. Wealth accumulation is a prevalent behavior among the elite (primarily business owners) in order to maintain their stature. Wealth accumulation is a negative behavior and one of its manifestations is the unwillingness to allocate profit to capital. There are several ways to allocate or convert profit into capital. One is to improve the means of production by increasing technology, resources, and manpower. Another is to increase the labor wages to improve employee morale and therefore an increase in production.

The attributes outlined above suggest that in a market economy such as ours, the society’s or the economy’s survival is based on how we could maximize the capacity and resources to generate the means to suffice the necessities (at the least) of individuals (or the nation) and minimize the effects that go along with those.



[1] Bertell Ollman, Market Economy: Advantages and Disadvantages, Oct 1999, http://www.nyu.edu/projects/ollman

[2] Milton Friedman, Natural Rate of Unemployment, http://www.huppi.com

No comments: